THE AUTHENTICITY OF MUTTAFAQ HADITHS BY IBN KHUZAIMAH AND AL-HĀKIM: A REVIEW
Abstract
The muttafaq hadith, apart from Ṣaḥīḥ Bukhari-Muslim, is not widely known, even though there are other Sahih books besides those two. Among the Sahih books are Ṣaḥīḥ Ibn Khuzaimah and Mustadrak al-Hakim. While the authenticity of the muttafaq 'alaih (The hadith of Bukhari-Muslim) is clear and accepted by all Muslims, the same cannot be said for the authenticity of muttafaq hadith outside of Bukhari-Muslim. There is an assumption that the similarity in the chain of narration (sanad) of muttafaq hadith narrated by Imams apart from Bukhari-Muslim does not always indicate the authenticity of the hadith. To test this assumption, this research uses four samples of muttafaq hadith on the topic of "Friday bathing" from Sahih Ibn Khuzaimah and Mustadrak al-Hakim as the primary data. Data analysis reveals that the similarity in the sanad of muttafaq hadith is not an indicator of the authenticity of the sanad, but the similarity in the text (matan) of muttafaq hadith provides an indication of its authenticity. These findings demonstrate that the higher standard of hadith authenticity set by Imam Ibn Khuzaimah compared to Imam al-Hakim does not guarantee that their muttafaq hadith meets the criteria of hadith authenticity. This research provides new insights into the evaluation of the authenticity of muttafaq hadith in hadith studies. [Hadis muttafaq selain Ṣaḥīḥ Bukhari-Muslim, belum begitu dikenal, padahal kitab ṣaḥīḥ tidak hanya dua itu. Di antara kitab Ṣaḥīḥ adalah Ṣaḥīḥ Ibn Khuzaimah dan Mustadrak Ḥākim. Jika ke-saḥīḥ-an hadis muttafaq ‘alaih (Bukhari-Muslim) sudah jelas dan diterima semua muslim, tidak demikian dengan ke-saḥīḥ-an hadis muttafaq selain Bukhari Muslim. Terdapat asumsi bahwa kesamaan dalam sanad hadis muttafaq antar Imam selain Bukhari-Muslim tidak selalu menunjukkan ke-saḥīḥ-an hadis. Untuk menguji asumsi tersebut, penelitian ini menggunakan 4 sampel hadis muttafaq dengan topik “mandi hari Jumat” dari kitab mereka sebagai data utama. Analisis data menunjukkan bahwa kesamaan dalam sanad hadis muttafaq tidak menjadi indikator ke-saḥīḥ-an sanad, tetapi kemiripan dalam matan hadis muttafaq memberikan indikasi ke-saḥīḥ-an matan. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa standar ke-saḥīḥ-an hadis Imam Ibn Khuzaimah yang lebih tinggi daripada Imam al-Hakim, tidak mampu memberi kepastian bahwa hadis muttafaq keduanya memenuhi syarat ke-saḥīḥ-an sanad dan matan. Hasil penelitian ini memberikan pemahaman baru tentang penilaian ke-saḥīḥ-an hadis muttafaq dalam kajian hadis.]
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)References
Abdullah, Emad Hameed. “The Suggestive Connotation In The Noble Prophetic Hadith A Study In Sahih Ibn Khuzaymah.” Journal of Al Imam Al-Adham University College, no. 38 part 2 (2022). https://www.iasj.net/iasj/article/230109.
Abi Hatim, Muhammad bin Hibban bin Ahmad. al-Ṡiqat. Vol. 9. Hindi: Majlis Dairat al-Maarif, 1973.
Ābid, Sundus ’Ādil Jāsim al-’. “Muwāzanah baina Manhaj Abī Dāwūd fī Sunanihi wa Ibn Khuzaimah fī Ṣaḥīḥih.” Majallah Kulliyyah Dār al-’Ulūm 36, no. 125 (1 Agustus 2019): 533–76. https://doi.org/10.21608/mkda.2019.124565.
Abū al-Qāsim Alī bin al-Ḥasan bin Hibatullah, Ibn ’Asākir. Tabyīn Każb al-Muftarī fī Mā Nusiba ilā al-Imām Abī al-Ḥasan al-Asy’arī. Beirut: Dār al-Kitāb al-’Arabī, tt.
Abu Yāsir, Muhammad bin Maṭar bin Uṡmān. Tadwīn al-Sunnah al-Nabawiyyah: Nasy’atuh wa Taṭawwuruh min al-Qarn al-Awwal ilā NIhāyah al-Qarn al-Tāsi’ al-Ḥijrī. Riyadh: Dār al-Hijrah, 1996.
Al-Ani, Dr Muhammad bin Abdul Karim bin Abdul Rahman bin Abdul Karim. “‘ZAWAED SAHIH IBN KHUZAYMAH’ ON THE SIX BOOKS IN THE BOOK OF THE ‘IMAMATE’ COLLECTING, STUDYING AND AUTHENTICATING.” Researcher Journal For Islamic Sciences 1, no. 1 (2021). https://www.iasj.net/iasj/article/221160.
Al-Asqalānī, Abū al-Faḍl Ahmad bin ’Ali bin Muhamad bin Ahmad bin Hajar. al-Nukat ’alā Kitāb Ibn Ṣalāḥ li Ibn al-Ḥajar. Madinah: ’Imādah al-Baḥṡ al-’Ilmī bi al-Jāmi’ah al-Islāmiyyah, 1984.
———. Fatḥ al-Bārī. Beirut: Dār al-Ma’rifah, 1379.
———. Tahżīb al-Tahżīb. Hindi: Dāirah al-Ma’ārif al-Niẓāmiyyah, 1326.
———. Taqrīb al-Tahżīb. Suria: Dār al-Rasyīd, 1986.
Albānī, Muhammad al-. Ṣaḥīḥ Sunan Abī Dāwūḍ. Kuwait: Mu’assasah Gharras, 2002.
Al-Bukhārī, Muhammad bin Ismā’īl Abū Abdillah. Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukharī. Vol. 2. Damaskus: Dār Ibn Kaṡīr, 1993.
Ali, Khamis Dhari Abd. “The Most Correct Thing in the Chapter in Sahih Ibn Khuzaymah - May God Have Mercy on Him - (a Critical Study).” Journal of the College of Islamic Sciences 17, no. 25–1 (2022). https://www.iasj.net/iasj/article/232061.
Burqānī, Aḥmad bin Muḥammad al-. Su’ālāt al-Burqānī li al-Dāruquṭnī. Lahore: Kutub Khānah al-Jamīlī, 1404.
Dāruquṭnī, ’Alī bin Umar al-. al-’Ilal al-Wāridah fī al-Aḥādīṡ al-Nabawiyyah. Riyadh: Dār al-Ṭaybah, 1985.
———. Ilal al-Dāruquṭnī. Riyadh: Dār al-Ṭaybah, 1985.
“Dīwān al-Sunnah.” ttt, tt.
Fauzān, Abdullah bin Ṣāliḥ al-. Minhah al-’Allam fi Syarḥ al-Bulūgh al-Marām. ttt: Dār Ibn Jawzī, 1435.
Firdausy, Hilmy. “MENGENAL SAHIH IBN KHUZAYMAH: Sistematika, Metodologi dan [O]Posisinya di Antara Kitab Sahih.” Jurnal Ushuluddin 25, no. 2 (14 Desember 2017): 188–207. https://doi.org/10.24014/jush.v25i2.3507.
Ghawriy, Sayyid Abd Al-Majid al-. al-Muyassar fī ’Ilm al-Jarḥ wa al-Ta’dīl. Beirut: Dār Ibn Kaṡīr, 2007.
———. Mu’jam Alfāẓ al-Jarḥ wa al-Ta’dīl. Beirut: Dār Ibn Kaṡīr, 2007.
Haiṡamī, Alī bin Abī Bakr al-. Majma’ al-Zawāid wa Manba’ al-Fawāid. Kairo: Maktabah al-Qudsī, 1994.
Haj, Wael Abdulkarim Mohammed. “Imam Abu Bakr Muhammad Ibn Ishaq Ibn Khuzaymah Al-Nisabouri (311 AH) And Say (the Most Correct Thing in This sectionCritical Study.” Journal of Tikrit University for Humanities 25, no. 11 (2018). https://www.iasj.net/iasj/article/182269.
Ḥajjāj, Muslim bin. Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim. Vol. 2. 2 vol. Beirut: DKI, 2004.
Ḥākim, Abū ’Abd Allah al-. al-Mustadrak ’alā al-Ṣaḥīḥain. 5 vol. Beirut: Dār al-Ma’rifah, tt.
Ḥamdān, ’Abd al-Azīz Syākir. al-Imām Ibn Khuzaimah wa Manhajuh fī Kitabih al-Ṣaḥīḥ. Beirut: Dār Ibn Ḥazm, 1996. https://ia600900.us.archive.org/21/items/hadith-01/0474-.zip.
Ḥamdān, ’Āṣim. “al-Aḥādīṡ al-latī Ḥakama al-’Ulamā’ ’alaihā bi al-Waḍ’i fī Mustadrak al-Ḥākim.” Majallah Kulliyyah Adāb bi al-Wād al-Jadīd 8, no. 16 (1 Desember 2022): 53–70. https://doi.org/10.21608/mkwn.2022.278160.
Ḥamūdī, Muhammad Hāsyim. “Al-Aḥādīṡ Allatī A’allahā Ibn Khuzaimah Fī Ṣaḥīḥih Kitāb al-Manāsik Anmūżaj.” Journal of Islamic Sciences 1, no. 23 (2019). https://www.iasj.net/iasj/article/199717.
Ḥasanī, al-Ḥāriṡ bin ’Alī al-. Muntaqā alfāẓ bi Taqrīb ’Ulūm al-Ḥadīṡ li al-Huffaẓ. Damaskus: Maktabah Dār al-Bayān, 2016.
ī, Ibrāhim bin Umar al-Biqā’. al-Nukat al-Wafiyyah bimā fī Syarḥ al-Alfiyyah. ttt: Maktabah al-Rusyd, 2007.
ī, Muqbil bin al-Hādī al-Wadda’. al-Muqtarāḥ fī Ajwibah Ba’d As’ilah al-Muṣṭalāḥ. 3 ed. Yaman: Dār al-Aṡār, 2004.
Ibn Ādī, Abu Aḥmad. al-Kāmil fī Ḍu’afā’ al-Rijāl. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-’ilmiyyah, 1997.
Ibn al-’Irāqī, ِAḥmad bin ’Abd al-Raḥīm. Tuḥfah al-al-Taḥṣīl fi al-Marāsīl. Riyadh: Maktabah al-Rusyd, tt.
Ibn Ḥibbān, Muhammad. Ṣaḥīḥ Ibn Ḥibbān. Beirut: Dār Ibn Ḥazm, 2012.
Ibn Khuzaimah, Abū Bakr Muhammad bin Isḥaq. Ṣaḥīḥ Ibn Khuzaimah. 4 vol. Riyadh: Dār al-Mimān, 2009.
Ibn Manẓūr, Muhammad bin Mukrim bin ’Alī. Lisān al-’Arab. 15 vol. Beirut: Dār al-Ṣādir, 1414.
Ibn Mulaqqan, ‘Amr bin ’Alī. Mukhtaṣār Talkhīṣ al-Żahabī. Vol. 7. Riyadh: Dār al-’Āṣimah, 1411.
Ibn Mulaqqin, ‘Amr bin ’Alī. al-Muqni’ fī ’Ulūm al-Ḥadīṡ. Vol. 1. Saudi Arabia: Dār al-Fawāz, 1413.
Ibn Ṣalāḥ, Ūṡmān bin Abd al-Raḥmān. Muqaddimah Ibn Ṣalāḥ: Ma’rifah Anwā’ ’Ulūm al-Ḥadīṡ. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr, 1406.
Īd, Ibn Daqīq al-’. al-Iqtirāḥ fī bayān al-Iṣṭilāḥ. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-’ilmiyyah, tt.
Irmayanti, Irmayanti. “Metode Ibn Khuzaymah Dan Ibn Hibban Dalam Menentukan Keshahihan Hadis Studi Komparatif Terhadap Kitab Shahih Ibn Khuzaymah Dan Kitab Shahih Ibn Hibban.” Tesis Magister, Institut Ilmu Al-Quran (IIQ) Jakarta, 2015. http://repository.iiq.ac.id//handle/123456789/617.
Jadī’, Abd Allah bin Yūsuf al-. Taḥrīr ’Ulūm al-Ḥadīṡ. Vol. 2. Beirut: Mu’assasah al-Rayyān, 2003.
Jāsim, Syu’aib Hilāl. “Mā Infarad Bih Ibn Khuzaimah Min Alfāẓ Al-Jarḥ Wa al-Ta’dīl Fī Ṣaḥīḥih (Jam’).” Anbar University Journal of Islamic Sciences 4, no. 15 (2013). https://www.iasj.net/iasj/article/76556.
Khaḍīr, ’Abd al-Karīm al-. Syaḥ Alfiyyah al-’Irāqī. ttt: tp, tt.
Khālidī, Fahd Ḍilāl Salīm al-. “Qaul Al-Imām Ibn Khuzaimah Fī Ṣaḥīḥih (in Ṣaḥḥ al-Khabr) Dirāsah Naqdiyyah.” Journal of the College of Islamic Sciences 26, no. 2 (2022). https://www.iasj.net/iasj/article/256767.
Mehmood, Sajid, dan Muhammad Riaz Khan Al Azhari. “Imām Ibn Khuzaymah and His Methodology in Ṣaḥīḥ Ibn Khuzaymah.” Journal of Islamic and Religious Studies 1, no. 1 (30 Juni 2016): 107–20. https://doi.org/10.36476/JIRS.1:1.06.2016.09.
Muhaisen, M. M. Muhammad Hamid. “The Questioning in the Hadith of the Prophet, Sahih Ibn Khuzaymah, as a Model Grammatical Study.” Magazine Aldhakwat Albedh 2, no. 8 (2023). https://www.iasj.net/iasj/article/284787.
Muhammad al-Uṡaibī, ’Aṭa. “Muṣṭalaḥ (ḤadĪṡ Kabīr) ’inda al-A’immah Dirasah Naẓariyyaha Taṭbīqiyyah ’alā Mustadrak al-Ḥākim.” Ḥawliyat Kulīyah Da’wah bi al-Qāhirah 21, no. 38 (1 Desember 2023): 53–96. https://doi.org/10.21608/bfdc.2023.330402.
Munāwī, Abd al-Ra’ūf al-. al-Yawāqīt wa al-Durar fī Syarḥ Nukhbah Ibn Ḥajar. Vol. 1. Riyadh: Maktabah al-Rusyd, 1999.
———. Fayḍ al-Qadīr. Mesir: al-Maktabah al-Tijariyyah al-Kubrā, 1356.
Muẓhiī, al-Ḥusain bin Maḥmūd al-. al-Mafātīh fī Syarḥ al-Maṣābih. 6 vol. Kuwait: Dār al-Nawādir, 2012.
Mz, Zainuddin MZ Zainuddin. “Menimbang Validitas Sahih Ibn Khuzaymah.” Islamica: Jurnal Studi Keislaman 4, no. 1 (2 September 2009): 154–64. https://doi.org/10.15642/islamica.2009.4.1.154-164.
Qahṭānī, Sa’ūd bin Māni’ bin Musfir al-. “Al-aḥādīts al-Latī Tabarra’a Ibn Khuzaymah min ’Ahdatihā aw ’Ahdati Rawātihā fī Kitābih al-Ṣaḥīḥ: Jam’an wa Dirāsah.” Majallah al-Dirāsah al-’Arābiyyah 47, no. 2 (1 Januari 2023): 891–942. https://doi.org/10.21608/dram.2023.278099.
Sakhāwī, Syams al-Dīn al-. Fatḥ al-Mughīṡ Syarh Alfiyyah al-Ḥadīṡ li al-’Irāqī. Vol. 1. Mesir: Maktabah Sunnah, 2003.
Subki, Tajuddin al-. Tabaqat al-Syafi’iyyah al-Kubra. Vol. 1. Halb: Faiṣal Isā al-Bābī al-Halabī, 1964.
Suyūṭī, Abd al-Rahmān al-. al-Baḥr Alladzī Zakhar fī Syarḥ Alfiyyah al-Aṡār. Vol. 2. Saudi Arabia: Maktabah al-Ghuraba’ al-Aṡriyyah, 1442.
Syaibāni, al-Mubārak bin Muhammad bin Muhammad bin Muhammad al-. al-Nihāyah fī Gharīb al-Ḥadiṡ wa al-Aṡār. 5 vol. Beirut: al-Maktabah al-’Ilmiyyah, 1979.
Syuhbah, Muhammad bin Muhammad bin Suwailam Abu. al-Wasīṭ fī ’Ulūm wa Musṭalāḥ al-Ḥadīṡ. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr al-’Arabī, tt.
Ṭabrānī, Sulaimān bin Aḥmad al-. Mu’jam al-Awsāṭ. Kairo: Dār al-Ḥaramain, 1995.
Taḥḥān, Mahmūd al-. Taysīr Muṣṭalāḥ Ḥadīṡ. Jeddah: al-Ḥarāmain, 1985.
’Uwaid, Muhammad. “Bughyat al-Bāḥiṡ ’an Bayān Muṣṭalaḥ Gharīb Gharīb ’inda al-Imām Ibn Khuzaymah fī Kitābih al-Ṣaḥīḥ: Dāsah Ta’ṣīlīyah ḥadīṡīyyah.” Ḥawliyat Kulīyah Uṣūl al-Dīn bi al-Qāhirah 32, no. 2 (1 Januari 2019): 885–962. https://doi.org/10.21608/bfarc.2019.108812.
Żahabī, Syams al-Dīn al-. al-Mūqiẓah. Kuwait: Dār al-Rakāiz li al-Nasyr wa al-Tauzī’, 2018.
———. Siyar a’lām al-Nubalā’. Vol. 17. ttt: Mu’assasah Risālah, 1985.
ẓamī, Muhammad Ḍiyā’ al-Raḥman al-A’. al-Jāmi’ al-Kāmil fī al-Ḥadīṡ al-Ṣaḥīḥ al-Syāmil al-Murattab ’alā Abwāb al-Fiqh. Riyadh: Dār al-Salām, 2016.
Zarkasyī, Badr al-Din. al-Nukat ’alṣ Muqaddimah Ibn al-Ṣalāḥ li al-Zarkasyī. Vol. 1. Riyadh: Aḍwā’ al-Salaf, 1998.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.