THE IMPACT OF SCHOLAR'S DIFFERENCES IN DETERMINING THE STATUS OF HADITH ON THE LAW OF MARRIAGE GUARDIANS AND DOWRIES
Abstract
The different methods of scholars in determining the status of traditions have a significant impact on the formulation of Islamic law. This study discusses the disputed hadiths in Bidāyat al-Mujtahid, especially in the book of al-Nikāḥ, and their implications for the law of marriage guardians and the minimum standard of dowry. This research uses the literature review method by tracing and analyzing the hadiths of disputed status. The results show that there are two main hadith that are disputed by scholars. while the standard minimum dowry hadith is also rejected by the majority of scholars due to the weakness of its narrators. These differences have implications for Islamic law, particularly in the regulation of marriage guardians and dowries in various Muslim countries. This study contributes to understanding the role of hadith criticism in the formulation of Islamic law. However, this study is limited to an analysis of Bidāyat al-Mujtahid and has not examined the implementation of the law in various Muslim countries. Further studies are needed to explore the application of hadith criticism methodology in contemporary legal systems. [Perbedaan metode ulama dalam menilai keabsahan hadis berdampak signifikan terhadap formulasi hukum Islam. Penelitian ini mengkaji perbedaan penilaian ulama terhadap dua hadis dalam Bidāyat al-Mujtahid, khususnya dalam kitab al-Nikāḥ, serta pengaruhnya terhadap hukum wali nikah dan standar minimal mahar. Kajian ini menggunakan metode kajian kepustakaan dengan pendekatan analisis isi (content analysis), menelusuri serta menganalisis hadis-hadis yang diperdebatkan statusnya. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat dua hadis utama yang diperselisihkan derajatnya oleh para ulama. Hadis pertama tentang kewajiban wali dalam pernikahan dinilai lemah oleh Mazhab Hanafi, sedangkan hadis standar minimal mahar juga ditolak oleh jumhur ulama karena kelemahan perawinya. Perbedaan ini berdampak pada hukum Islam, khususnya dalam regulasi wali nikah dan mahar di berbagai negara Muslim. Kajian ini berkontribusi dalam memahami peran kritik hadis dalam formulasi hukum Islam. Namun, penelitian ini terbatas pada analisis Bidāyat al-Mujtahid dan belum mengkaji implementasi hukum di berbagai negara Muslim. Studi lanjutan diperlukan untuk mengeksplorasi penerapan metodologi kritik hadis dalam sistem hukum kontemporer.]
Keywords
References
Abi Syaibah, Abu Bakar bin, Mushannaf Ibn Abi Syaibah, Riyadh: Maktabah al-Rusyd, 1409.
Abu Dawud, Sulaiman bin Asy’as| bin Ishaq bin Basyir bin Syaddad bin Umar al-Azdi, Sunan Abi Dawud, Beirut: al-Maktabah al-‘Asriyah, tt.
Al-Asqolani, Abu al-Fadhl Ahmad bin Ali bin Muhammad bin Ahmad bin Hajar, al-Dirayah, Beirut: Dar al-Ma’rifah, tt.
Al-Baihaqi, Abu Bakar, Al-Sunan al-Kubra li al-Baihaqi, Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah, 2003.
Al-Bukhari, Muhammad bin Ismail, Al-Tarikh al-Kabir, Riyadh: Al-Mamlakah al-‘Arabiyyah al-Su’udiyyah, 2019.
Al-Darimi, Abu Muhammad Abdillah bin Abdirrahman bin al-Faḍl bin Bahram bin Abdi al-Ṣamad, Arab Saudi: Dar al-Mughni li al-Nasr wa al-Tauzi’, 2000.
Al-Daruqutni, Abu al-Hasan Ali bin Umar bin Ahmad bin Mahdi bin Mas’ud bin Nu’man bin Dinar al-Baghdadi, Sunan al-Daruqutni, Beirut: Muassasah al-Risalah: 2004.
Al-Zahabi, Syamsuddin Muhammad bin Ahmad bin Usman, Mizan al-I’tidal, Beirut: Dar al-Ma’rifah, tt.
________________________________________________, Siyar A’lam al-Nubala’, (Beirut: Muassasah al-Risalah, 1985.
Al-Hamwi, Majid, Tahqiq Bidayat al-Mujtahid wa Nihayat al-Muqtasid, Beirut: Dar Ibn Hazm, 1995.
Al-Jauzi, Jamaluddin Abu al-Farj Abdurrahman bin Ali bin Muhammad, I’lam al-‘Alam ba’da Rusukhihi bi Nasikh al-Hadis wa Mansukhihi , Beirut: Dar Ibn Hazm, 2002.
Al-Marakisyi, Al-Mu’jib fi Talkhis Akhbar Ahl al-Maghrib, Beirut: Al-Maktabah Al-Asriyah, 2006.
Al-Mizzi, Yusuf, Tahzib al-Kamal fi Asma’ al-Rijal, (Beirut: Muassasah al-Risalah, 1983
Al-Qaisarani, Abu al-Fadhl Muhammad Tahir al-Muqdisi al-Syaibani Ibn Tahir, Dzakhiratu al-Huffadz, Riyadh: Dar al-Shami’i li al-Nasyr wa al-Tauzi’.
_______________________________, Tadzkiratu al-Huffadz, Riyadh: Dar al-Shami’i li al-Nasyr wa al-Tauzi’.
Al-Qurtubi, Abu al-Walid Muhammad bin Ahmad bin Muhammad bin Ahmad bin Rusyd, Bidayatu al-Mujtahid wa Nihayatu al-Muqtasid, Kairo: Dar al-Hadis, 2004.
Al-Sakhowi, Syamsu al-Din Abu al-Khair Muhammad bin Abdurrahman bin Muhammad, al-Maqashid al-Hasanah, Beirut: Dar al-Kitab al-Araby, 1985.
Al-Tamimi, Muhammad bin Hibban bin Ahmad bin Hibban bin Mu’adz bin Ma’bad, Al-Ihsan fi Taqrīb Sahih Ibn Hibban, Beirut: Muassasah al-Risalah, 1988.
______________________, Al-Majruhin min al-Muhaddisin wa al-Duafa’ wa al-Matrukin, Aleppo: Dar al-Wa’yi, 1396 H.
Al-Tirmidzi, Muhammad bin Isa bin Saurah bin Musa bin al-Dahak, Sunan al-Tirmidzi, (Mesir: Sirkat al-Maktabah al-Halabi), 1975.
Al-Uqaily, Al-Du’afa al-Kabir li al-Uqaily, Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, tt.
Al-Zuhayliy, Wahbah, Fiqh al-Islāmiy wa Adillatuh Damaskus: Dār al-Fikr, 2007.
Ibn Abidin al-Dimasyqi al-Hanafi, Radd al-Muhtar ‘ala al-Dur al-Mukhtar, Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, 1992.
Ibn Nujaim al-Misri, al-Bahr al-Rāiq Syarh Kanz al-Daqaiq, Dar al-Kitab al-Islami, tt.
Sakhowi, Sakhowi. “Taqnīn Method of Qānūn Jināyah and Problems of Its Implementation in Aceh, Indonesia.” JIL: Journal of Islamic Law 3, no. 2 (31 Agustus 2022): 193–211. https://doi.org/10.24260/jil.v3i2.817.
Tahhan, Mahmud, Taisir Mustalah al-Hadis, Riyadh: Maktabah al-Ma’arif, 2010.
Tal’at, Muhammad bin, Mu’jam al-Mudallisin, Riyadh: Dar Adwa’ al-Salaf, 2005
Trisna, Landy, Abdurrahman. “Conflict in Islamic Jurisprudence: Noel J. Coulson’s Historical Approach and His Contribution to the Study of Islamic Law.” JIL: Journal of Islamic Law 3, no. 1 (9 Februari 2022): 74–93. https://doi.org/10.24260/jil.v3i1.495.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
